Connection.Questions Make your own

Tag video questions

Tag questions are comparative and fast — this or that, who is more likely to, best and worst. Here are 48 built for the format, whether you are filming with someone or answering about them.

Straight this-or-that

No thinking. That is the point — the speed is the format.

Who is more likely to

Where it gets funny, because one of you is wrong.

First, last, best, worst

Superlatives make people commit, which is what you want on camera.

The ones that get an actual answer

Slip one of these in near the end, when nobody is performing any more.

The hard part isn’t answering. It’s choosing.

Spin it, then film whatever it lands on. You get the question you would have scrolled past, which is usually the one worth filming.

Press spin. You do not get to pick.

Does any of this actually work?

A fixed list of escalating questions beat small talk in the lab — and that is where every tag video's structure comes from, whether or not anyone knows it. Aron and colleagues (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997) had pairs of strangers work through “self-disclosure and relationship-building tasks that gradually escalate in intensity” over 45 minutes, and found greater closeness than comparable small-talk tasks. This is the origin of the popular “36 questions.” Two caveats we will not hide: the sample sizes we could not verify (the full text was paywalled), and studies 2 and 3 found no significant effect from matching pairs on attitudes or from telling them to expect to like each other. The escalation on this page is us applying Aron's ordering — most tags do not escalate, and nobody has tested whether they should.

The best moments will not be the questions. In the speed-dating study inside Huang et al. (2017) — 110 people, 15–19 four-minute dates each — it was follow-up questions that predicted getting a second date, with the authors estimating that an 8% difference in follow-up rate corresponded to roughly one extra success across an evening of 20 dates. They state plainly: “one cannot interpret this relationship causally.” They also note that in fixed-list studies like Aron’s, participants “were not instructed or encouraged to ask follow-up questions.” Our reading: the list is scaffolding. The watchable part is the unscripted “wait, why?”

We could not establish who started the boyfriend tag, so we are not telling you. We looked for a documented originator or first video and found no reliable source. Plenty of pages state one confidently; none we found could support it. What is checkable is only that individual uploads exist with visible publish dates — which says nothing about origin.

The tag was a discovery mechanic before it was a format. It spread because you tagged other creators at the end and they filmed their own version, which is how the audience moved between channels. Without anyone to tag, it is a question list with a countdown — still watchable, but you have removed the part that made tags grow channels in the first place.

Last checked 21 September 2026.