Connection.Questions Make your own

Fun questions to ask your partner

Fun does not have to mean empty — each of these 60 is quick and daft enough to answer in a sentence, and still tells you something you did not already know, which is the difference between a game and a warm-up.

Easy ones, to start

Nobody opens with the hard question. These are the ones you can ask with the plates still on the table, and they still tell you something.

Questions that actually go somewhere

The middle rung. Still safe, but the answer is about who someone is rather than what they did, which is the whole difference.

The ones most people never get to

Ask these when there is time and nobody has to be anywhere.

When something is off

The ones people skip. Skipping them is usually why the same thing keeps coming back.

Where things are going

Fewer of these on purpose. A conversation that is only about the future is a planning meeting.

Some questions are easier to answer when neither of you chose them.

That’s why we made them into a wheel. Spin it — this one is loaded with the questions on this page.

Press spin. You do not get to pick.

Now make one that knows you → $11 once · your photos and inside jokes · yours to keep

Does any of this actually work?

The honest answer starts by conceding the opposite of what this genre normally claims. Across five experiments on deep versus shallow conversation, the systematic error people made — expecting more awkwardness and less connection than they actually got — was widest for the deep questions. In other words, your intuition about a light question is roughly accurate. It is not secretly profound. The thing you are wrong about is the deep end, not this one.

What makes a light question earn its place is what comes after it. In a study of 199 pairs chatting online, one person in each pair was privately instructed to ask at least nine questions or at most four. Partners liked the high askers more, and the mechanism was responsiveness — measured behaviourally as the number of follow-up questions asked. A daft question with a real follow-up outperforms a serious question that gets a nod. The askers, incidentally, did not predict any of this in advance.

There is also a case for novelty in its own right. Across a questionnaire study, a door-to-door survey and three laboratory experiments, couples who did something novel and arousing together for seven minutes reported greater relationship quality afterwards than couples given a more mundane task — and greater than a no-activity control, so the effect was the novelty and not merely the time. In the survey data the link between exciting shared activity and satisfaction ran through relationship boredom. Seven minutes of something silly is a smaller ask than it sounds.

Kardas, Kumar & Epley (2022), Overly shallow?: Miscalibrated expectations create a barrier to deeper conversation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · source
Aron, Norman, Aron, McKenna & Heyman (2000), Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · source

Fifty is more than any evening needs. The failure mode here is treating the page as a checklist and working down it — three questions with a real follow-up beats twenty with a nod, and the wheel exists because picking three is the part people are bad at.

Last checked 28 August 2026.