Connection.Questions Make your own

Thanksgiving questions

There are no right answers here. These 40 questions are for the table itself — the year just gone, the people sitting around it, the dishes that keep turning up — not a quiz about the Mayflower, and nothing political.

Easy ones, to start

Nobody opens with the hard question. These are the ones you can ask with the plates still on the table, and they still tell you something.

Questions that actually go somewhere

The middle rung. Still safe, but the answer is about who someone is rather than what they did, which is the whole difference.

When something is off

The ones people skip. Skipping them is usually why the same thing keeps coming back.

Where things are going

Fewer of these on purpose. A conversation that is only about the future is a planning meeting.

Some questions are easier to answer when neither of you chose them.

Turn one over. You would not have picked it — that is the point.

Six questions from this page, face down.

On the site they live on a wheel. You spin, it lands, nobody chose it.

Now make one that knows you → $11 once · your photos and inside jokes · yours to keep

Does any of this actually work?

The no-politics rule on this page is not squeamishness — it is the one thing about this particular meal that has actually been measured. Using anonymised smartphone-location data matched to precinct-level voting, researchers found that Thanksgiving dinners attended by residents from opposing-party precincts ran 30 to 50 minutes shorter than same-party dinners, a decline from a mean of 257 minutes that survived extensive spatial and demographic controls. In 2016 that reduction tripled for travellers arriving from media markets carrying heavy political advertising — an effect not present in 2015. Nationwide the authors put the total at 34 million hours of cross-partisan Thanksgiving dinner discourse lost in a single year. The study measures how long people stayed, not what was said, and it cannot tell you which question cleared which room; reading it onto a question list is my inference and not the authors’. It is still the reason not one question here asks what anybody thinks about anything currently in the news.

Several of these ask you to say the grateful part to a person rather than into the middle of the table, and that choice has evidence behind it. Across three experiments, participants wrote gratitude letters and then predicted how the recipient would feel. Expressers underestimated how surprised recipients would be, overestimated how awkward they would feel, and underestimated how positive they would feel; both expected awkwardness and expected mood tracked how willing people were to express gratitude at all. The paper is preregistered, with open data and materials. It studied letters between two people rather than a sentence said down a table of fourteen, so stretching it to this page is my extension and not a finding. The direction is the part worth having: whoever is certain it would be embarrassing is the one person at the table with a known bias about that.

The questions about grandparents, old houses and who made which dish first rest on thinner evidence than you have probably been told. The much-repeated result is a brief report written to test what its own authors call an instance of “clinical lore”: children’s and adolescents’ knowledge of family history was significantly correlated with internal locus of control, higher self-esteem, better family functioning, greater family cohesiveness, lower anxiety and a lower incidence of behaviour problems. That is a correlation, in one short report, with no experiment behind it and no direction established — families that function well may simply be the families where the stories get told. Every November article promising that asking about your grandparents will make your children resilient is standing on that one paper without saying so. The smaller claim is the one worth making: on a day when three or four generations are in one room, the people who can answer what did your grandparents do for work are not going to be in that room forever.

Our corpus runs to three depths and this set stops at two, deliberately. Thanksgiving is read aloud with everybody listening — a question that is right for two people on a sofa becomes a performance when it is asked down the length of a table, and there is no version of this meal where nobody is overhearing. Nothing here is deeper than something you would answer in front of an uncle you see once a year. For the same relatives on an ordinary weekend, with nobody carving anything, the questions to ask your grandparents go considerably further than a table this size allows.

Chen & Rohla (2018), The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties, Science · source
Kumar & Epley (2018), Undervaluing gratitude: Expressers misunderstand the consequences of showing appreciation, Psychological Science · source
Duke, Lazarus & Fivush (2008), Knowledge of family history as a clinically useful index of psychological well-being and prognosis, Psychotherapy · source

Most people who type this into a search box want the other thing: a Thanksgiving trivia quiz with an answer key — the first harvest, the Macy's parade, which president pardoned which turkey — and somebody keeping score. There is none of that here, and if the table is mostly children under ten this is the wrong page. A seven-year-old cannot answer what somebody here did this year that you never told them you noticed, and being asked it in front of everybody is a bad twenty seconds for a child. A printed quiz with right answers gives that table something to win, keeps the youngest player in the game instead of waiting out the adults, and does that job better than a page of open questions ever will.

Last checked 28 August 2026.